Article 52 of the European Patent Convention[ edit ] The European Patent Convention EPCArticle 52, paragraph 2, excludes from patentability, in particular discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods; aesthetic creations; schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, and programs for computers; [emphasis added] presentations of information. The provisions of paragraph 2 shall exclude patentability of the subject-matter or activities referred to in that provision only to the extent to which a European patent application or European patent relates to such subject-matter or activities as such. The Convention, as with all international conventions, should be construed using a purposive approach.
To satisfy his multiple curiosities de Hert teams up regularly with other authors. A human rights approach combined with a concern for theory is the common denominator of all his work. In his formative years, de Hert studied law, philosophy and religious sciences After several books and articles in law and a productive decade of research in areas such as policing, video surveillance, international cooperation in criminal affairs and international exchange of police information, he broadened up his scope of interests and published a book on the European Convention on Human Rights and Europes software patent law essay a doctorate in law in which he compared the constitutional strength of eighteenth and twentieth century constitutionalism in the light of contemporary social control practices 'Early Constitutionalism and Social Control.
Since he has edited with Serge Gutwirth and others annual books on data protection law before Springer, now Sage that, -judging sales numbers, quotations and downloads- attrack a massive readership and have contributed to creating the legal, academic discipline of data protection law.
A multi-layered and yet unexplored territory for legal research. Servent Ariadna Ripoll, Florian Trauner eds. Data protection is an EU law field that has undergone substantial change over the past few years. The Directive, upon which this analysis is focused, is an ambitious text, aimed at assuming the data protection standard-setting role within the EU Justice and Home Affairs field at Member State level.
All of them, however, are to be aligned with the provisions of the Directive. Although supervision tasks are uniformly entrusted to the EDPS, the different mandates for each of the actors continue to apply.
This, unnecessarily, complex legal architecture is found detrimental to the data protection purposes and ultimately against the requirements of Article 16 TFEU - Key words: The needed balances in EU Criminal Law: In this chapter, we focus on the role of supervisory authorities monitoring police and criminal justice authorities.
This issue raises delicate questions, as the EU legislator was called upon to strike the right balance between diverse interests. However, no one can deny either the importance of respecting fundamental rights and data protection rules, when collecting, storing, and exchanging personal data.
The role of these supervisory authorities constitutes an essential tool to ensure that an appropriate balance is taken and implemented by national police and criminal justice authorities; hence the sensitivity and interest of addressing this issue. After providing a birds-eye view of the EU data protection law in section II, we will briefly explain the basic role of supervisory authorities in section III.
Section IV will focus on the requirements for independence of supervisory authorities. In section V, we will look at the competence of such authorities in the supervision of judges and prosecutors. Section VI analyses the powers of supervisory authorities in the criminal justice sector.
Section VII provides some practical details on handling complaints and modes of cooperation of supervisory authori- ties. Our concluding remarks are presented in section VIII. Rowena Rodrigues, Vagelis Papakonstantinou eds. Possibilities, Actors and Building Blocks in a reformed landscape.
Erfgoed zonder bijzondere status vatbaar voor belangenafweging. Burke is politicus, jurist en filosoof. In deze bijdrage gebruik ik Burke om debatten over de grondslagen van het constitutionalisme en de mensenrechten te verduidelijken.
We horen het zo uit de mond van vele staatslui rollen, zeker wanneer het gaat om in belangrijke kwesties compromissen te sluiten en haalbare oplossingen te zoeken. Na een korte duiding van Burke als vroege criticus van de ongerijmdheden van de Franse revolutie, volgt een situering van Burke als common law constitutionalist in de Britse traditie.
Grondwetten groeien organisch en bevatten liefst geen al te abstracte regels die geweld aandoen aan de gegroeide praktijken en consensus in een gegeven samenleving.
Politieke wijsheid moet bij dergelijke afwijzingen primeren op regelvastheid. Ook in het mensenrechtenrecht is de geest van Burke niet veraf. Fundamental rights that might as well be struck from the Constitution. Brkan Maja, Evangelia Psychogiopoulou eds. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Through critical analysis of case law in Belgium courts, this chapter reveals the significant role courts play in the protection of privacy and personal data within the new technological environment.
It addresses the pressing question from a public who are increasingly aware of their privacy rights in a world of continual technological advances — namely, what can I do if my data privacy rights are breached?
European Data Protection Law Review 2 3 2:patenting of software running on a generic purpose computers, because in European patent law, for a claimed invention to be patentable, the innovative part of an invention must have “technical character” 6. A Brief History of Software Patents (and Why They’re Valid) I’ll refer to “software patents” in this essay, but I’m limiting this term solely to patents on a set of machine-readable instructions that direct a central processing unit (CPU) to perform specific operations in a computer.
The Shift to Patent Law. This paper is a comparative study of the legal protection for computer programs. It covers copyright protection as well as the protection computer programs receive form patent law.
The analysis is focused on the European Union, the United States, and Mexico, which is an example representative of.
The patentability of software, computer programs and computer-implemented inventions under the European Patent Convention (EPC) is the extent to which subject matter in these fields is patentable under the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of October 5, Prof.
Paul De Hert's work addresses problems in the area of privacy & technology, human rights and criminal law. To satisfy his multiple curiosities de . Prof. Paul De Hert's work addresses problems in the area of privacy & technology, human rights and criminal law.
To satisfy his multiple curiosities de Hert teams up regularly with other authors.