Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. At issue is nothing less than the fundamental question of whether or not we can keep the most lethal weapons known to mankind out of the hands of an unreconstructed tyrant and aggressor who is in the same league as the most brutal dictators of this century. As long as UNSCOM is prevented from carrying out its mission, the effort to monitor Iraqi compliance with Resolution becomes a dangerous shell game. Neither the United States nor the global community can afford to allow Saddam Hussein to continue on this path.
I find this claim plausible, for the following reasons You'll usually begin by putting some thesis or argument on the table for consideration. Then you'll go on to do one or two of the following: Criticize that argument or thesis Offer counter-examples to the thesis Defend the argument or thesis against someone else's criticism Offer reasons to believe the thesis Give examples which help explain the thesis, or which help to make the thesis more plausible Argue that certain philosophers are committed to the thesis by their other views, rewrite paper they do not come out and explicitly endorse the thesis Discuss what consequences the thesis would have, if it were true Revise the thesis in the light of some objection You'll conclude by stating the upshot of your discussion.
For instance, should we accept the thesis? Should we reject it?
Or should we conclude that we don't yet have enough information to decide whether the thesis is true or false? No matter which of these aims you set for yourself, you have to explicitly present reasons for the claims you make. You should try to provide reasons for these claims that might convince someone who doesn't already accept them.
A good philosophy paper is modest and makes a small point; but it makes that point clearly and straightforwardly, and it offers good reasons in support of it People very often attempt to accomplish too much in a philosophy paper.
The usual result of this is a paper that's hard to read, and which is full of inadequately defended and poorly explained claims. So don't be over-ambitious.
Don't try to establish any earth-shattering conclusions in your 5 page paper.
Done properly, philosophy moves at a slow pace. Originality The aim of these papers is for you to display familiarity with the material and an ability to think critically about it. Don't be disappointed if you don't make an utterly distinctive contribution to human thought in your first attempts at philosophical writing.
There will be plenty of time for that later on. Your critical intelligence will inevitably show up in whatever you write. An ideal paper will be clear and straightforward see belowwill be accurate when it attributes views to other philosophers see belowand will contain thoughtful critical responses to the texts we read.
It need not always break new ground. If you do want to demonstrate independent thought, don't think you have to do it by coming up with a novel argument.
You can also demonstrate independent thought by offering new examples of familiar points, or new counter-examples, or new analogies. Major Guidelines Thinking about a philosophical problem is hard. Writing about it ought not to be.
You're not trying to craft some fancy political speech.
You're just trying to present a claim and some reasons to believe it or disbelieve it, as straightforwardly as possible.
Here are some guidelines on how to do that. Make an outline Before you begin to write, you need to think about the questions:Use Paraphrasing Tool to paraphrase or rewrite full length essays and articles or to find new ways to express simple phrases, sentences or single words.
Whether your goal is to remix textual content for a website, term paper, business document, email or tweet, Paraphrasing Tool will do the trick. One afternoon in , as his parents and two brothers fished in the Gulf of Mexico, year-old Michael Dell sat on the beach, painstakingly putting together a trotline, a maze of ropes to which several fish hooks could be attached.
The research paper outline is essential for any article or term paper. The outline may make a great difference on how your work is interpreted. As a top writing resource, The Pen & The Pad is your first stop for expert tips and articles to help you write (and rewrite) your book, essay, paper and more.
Conservapedia / k ə n ˌ s ɜːr v ə ˈ p iː d i ə / is an English-language wiki encyclopedia project written from an American conservative point of view. The website was started in by American homeschool teacher and attorney Andrew Schlafly, son of conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly, to counter what he perceived as a liberal bias present in Wikipedia.
It uses editorials and a. Manual rewrite is more suited for academic purposes where the rewritten article is required to be high quality. Helps you rewrite work of other people so it becomes unique and plagiarism-free Auto rewriter can rewrite with .