Kidnapping; Robbery; and Any offense punishable by 10 years or more which includes an element of the use of force or involves a significant risk of force The statue also specifically excludes certain felonies such as unarmed robbery offenses or arsons which posed no threat to human life.
InWashington was the first state in the nation to adopt three-strikes legislation which imposed a mandatory life sentence without the possibility of parole for persons convicted for a third specific violent felony. The action was fueled by the highly publicized death of Diane Ballasiotes, who was raped and murdered by a convicted rapist who had been released from prison.
Voters, who were overcome with emotion over the atrocious acts committed by a released felon, passed the bill by a three to one margin.
California followed suit, passing similar legislation in By26 states in the nation had approved comparable laws. Although similar there are variations in the specifics, such as which offenses qualify as a strike and the number of strikes needed to be "out".
In twenty states three strikes are required. In one state, a mandatory life is imposed after the second strike. The driving force behind "three-strikes" legislation in Washington, were politicians wanting to "get tough on crime".
The reasoning behind the law was to reduce recidivism and get violent offenders off the street. I think that the legislation was merely a response to public outcry rather than a well thought out strategy to actually reduce crime.
Advocates say that after "three-strikes" laws were adopted across the country there was a drastic reduction in crime in general. They also argue that once a person has committed a his second "strike" and knows that he faces a life sentence if convicted again will think twice before committing another crime.
These arguments are fallacies. Finally what supporters fail to point out is that these three-strike laws target minorities over whites in a severely disproportionate amount. Homicides dropped 24 percent, forcible rapes dropped 25 percent, robbery dropped 16 percent and aggravated assault dropped 15 percent.
But do these number reflect the effect of the three-strike law or do they reflect an overall drop in crime across the country?
Violent crime was down nearly 22 percent, homicide was down 31 percent, forcible rapes dropped 15 percent and aggravated assault was down 16 percent. These numbers reflect the entire country. With only half twenty-six of the states having three-strike legislation, how can supporters claim this drastic reduction in crime was due to three-strikes?
Advocates also attempt to claim that three-strikes laws have a deterrent effect on criminals. In reality, most violent crimes committed are crimes committed in anger or under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and are not premeditated.
Most criminals are not rational thinkers to begin with, but when overcome with anger or under the influence of drugs or alcohol, they are thinking even less sensibly. They do not weigh the consequences of their actions and what penalties they face if caught.The “Three Strike” Sentencing The “Three Strikes and You’re Out” law is a law that was passed by California voters in The Three Strikes law is sentencing laws that mandate a prison sentence of 25 years to life for violent offenders who have been convicted of three or more offenses.
Three Strikes Laws From the beginning, the three strikes in law in California was shaped by tragic, personal stories. Take, for example, the story of Kimber Reynolds who, on a summer evening in , went out for coffee and cake with a friend at a local restaurant in Fresno.
The Influence of the Three Strikes Laws - The Three Strikes laws is a law that was first employed in the ’s and was established due to the public's dissatisfaction with . Supporters of three strikes laws have argued that the plummeting crime rates of the s were due in part to this tough new sentencing scheme.
They especially rely on California statistics, which cite the fact that approximately 1, offenders are sentenced per year in California under the three strikes law.
Currently, the Three Strikes policy, as an established law, relies upon continued propaganda and good press to keep up support for the laws. For example, looking at a recent article by Three Strikes legislation supporter Debra Saunders, she describes opponents of the .
The Washington State Three-Strikes Law This Research Paper The Washington State Three-Strikes Law and other 64,+ term papers, college essay examples and free essays are available now on timberdesignmag.com Autor: review • November 26, • Research Paper • 4/4(1).